Home
Contents
Search
Back
Up

November 2002

 

January 2002
February 2002
April 2002
March 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002



October 31, 2002 - Halloween

I've just finished reading about one of the scariest pieces of US legislation I've ever seen - UCITA or Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act makes all that verbiage (and more) that you find on "click-throughs" during installation of software (that won't install unless you click "OK") and inside sealed boxes of software (i.e. you can't read it until you've purchased the software) and even on web sites, binding even if it contravenes other laws such as those against fraud and other consumer protection statutes.

Watch this space for some thoughts and comments.

November 2, 2002

Today was "cherry tree" day - the tree in our back yard finally was removed. Lots of work hiking heavy pieces to Vance's van so he could take it to his home on Vancouver Island for carving. I'll post pictures of the results as I get them.

Today was also the date for the local Vancouver Cyber Crime gathering. I'm sorry I couldn't be there but the cherry tree has been in the works for several months now :(

There are lots of things in this world that I think should be changed - but the changes proposed in the cyber crime bill are so far out in left field that they are laughable - at least they would be if they were not real.

The biggest problem with it is the fact that such well meaning people have such a warped and bogus idea of what technology in general and the Internet in specific is all about. On the other hand, I suppose it is a not unrealistic attempt by well meaning people to deal with a problem they can't yet come to complete grips with.

So... having stated that I'm kind of in the middle; what is my specific stance on the problem or, what are my suggestions in the matter?

On the one hand we have the pornographers, bettors, spammers, frauds, cheats, liars, terrorists, fanatics, lunatics, etc.

On the other we have the law enforcement agencies, FBI, CIA, CSIS (Canada) and other national, regional, and local police forces as well as the various religious and ethnic organisations opposed to moral, legal and ethical subversions of all types and expressions.

And in the middle we have the civil libertarians and, increasingly, those of us who while not specifically aligned, give a damn about what is happening to our basic expectations of freedom of expression and actions. What is a fence-sitter to do?

Well, beside picking splinters out of the nether regions, I guess we have to take a stand. 

In my case I'm coming down on the side of the civil libertarians. Lots of reasons why, but a couple of main ones are:

bulletWhile the problems which have been jumped upon by the legal beagles are certainly exacerbated by the new communications age (of the Internet, fax, ubiquitous snail-mail, and telephone) they are not new and are not a product of these new technologies.
bulletThe "cures" proposed are ignorant of the technologies of the time and of the technologies of the (near) future.

The problems are not new. They've been around from time immemorial and will not disappear no matter what is done. If nothing else, this is a reasonable reason for not screwing around with our collective civil liberties (hard won over many years).

The cures will be invalidated by technologies already available, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. The "bad uglies" can take advantage of the cryptographic technologies available today to hide their transactions and transgressions for far longer than necessary to get away with them.

richard

 

 

Home ] Contents ] Search ]
Back ] Up ]

Copyright © 1993-2007 Richard C. Pitt - all rights reserved
Updated June 17, 2005