Home
Contents
Search
Back
Up
Next

October 2002

 

January 2002
February 2002
April 2002
March 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002



All this time I thought I was putting together an online magazine when in reality I was creating a "BLOG" - weblogs seem to be all the rage now.

For the past couple of years we have been using a WIKI for our internal thoughts. It has made an incredible difference to our geographically spread people - first with Lineo (and the spread was literally worldwide) and more recently with Belcarra and the fact that we all work from home and live a couple of miles apart at least.

Since July 1994 (p.s. - I hate frames, but the use in this case is necessary) I've been creating a mostly monthly archive (with some embarrassing gaps of many months) of what has gone on in my business life. Some have sidebars on personal items and some have interjections by others I've encouraged to speak in the same forum - the Digital Rag. In reality, it seems that it pretty much qualifies as a BLOG - since I've always made it a point to edit my text online (I've just saved the above text to the site and linked it in as the October Digital Rag) and solicit feedback while writing it (and afterwards too) albeit by e-mail instead of online comments.

It may be that, despite the fact that I have not used or created special software, I was one of the first to engage in this most public of diaries.

In fact, only yesterday (Oct 1, 2002) did I actually look up the word weblog and take a look at others' works in this area or the selection of software that has grown up to make the process easier (or at least more consistent).

As far as software is concerned, I started out using "vi" the most typical text editor on the UNIX (or Linux) operating systems for those of us who program close to the bare metal. I won't claim to have invented any particular construct, but you'll find the use of the <^>v symbols for "previous, up, next, down" in the menu structure as the issues evolve - a prelude to the text and graphic menu items you'll find in today's Digital Rag.

In case it has not become obvious from my writings, I freely admit that I'm lazy. Creating HTML pages using a text editor was not much different from creating books and documentation using TeX, except that the post processor for TeX would do things like pagenation and chapterization and tables of contents and all the other things that were really drudge work. Doing this by hand grew wearing quickly. In late 1997 I went over to the dark side and started using Microsoft's FrontPage, mostly due to its ability to create a menu structure with a simple drag-drop interface. I'm writing this using FrontPage 2000 (on Windows 2000 running under VMWare on RedHat 7.2 - I'm not all that far into the dark side ;)

Many of my first web writings are about the goings on around our ISP, Wimsey(.com), the first Canadian commercial ISP. Along with some items drawn from my readings (web and print) and a few articles by people who were customers (and friends), the Digital Rag of the time really formed a diary of the travails of the early days of the commercial Internet in Canada. We dealt with phone number changes, billing errors, new people, and all manner of minutiae. Since then they have given insight into our new business as well as some more "basic Internet" pieces and other "thoughts of the day".

Most recently I have branched things out to two different arenas - this, the continuation of the original Digital Rag, my personal diary area; and the Digital Rag Too under my Pacific Data Capture web site - now aimed at the business side of things.

I'm going to look at some of the BLOGs out there and think about putting up different software to do the dirty deed of getting my writing demon satiated. In the mean time I'm also going to continue writing - but might put a date at the point where I pick up an article after going to bed or a meeting or something...
happy reading! In the mean time I'm going to do things my way - posting new stuff at the bottom, not the top - at least in this month anyway.

October 4, 2002

I'm on a mail list to do with Copyright reform in Canada. Today I received a pointer to a newly published Canadian government report at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/rp00880e.html

This is to me, a follow-on to the official objection I've been working on for the Blank Media Levy proposal. See my page for more details and links. I've been called by a number of people about the effects this new copyright reform proposal will cause. I'll keep you informed. In the mean time, you might check out this report and any of the other links from here.

October 15, 2002

We (objectors to the media levy proposal) have all received copies of the CPCC case documents. The problem is that it seems CPCC has put in stuff that they received under a non disclosure from some of the objectors - such NDA that should/could/would prohibit them (CPCC) from sending it out to us, despite the fact that some (I for one) have signed our own NDAs with CPCC and the Board.  At this point I don't know whether I'm allowed to read a couple of the myriad of documents I have (79 Megs of PDF files!!!) or not.

Whatever the outcome, I've got a ton of reading to do before putting my own case files together for November 22 - then have to make 10 paper copies of everything and forward it to the Copyright Board - and make sure all the other objectors and the CPCC in particular get a copy electronically. Lots of fun, and things are just getting busy around here as far as business is concerned - wish the levy stuff had gone on its original schedule and we'd be over by now :(

I just received an inquiry about what an individual can do about the Media Levy at this late date. Following is the reply - reproduced here because the subject is near and dear to my heart and I really think more people should get involved with what is going on:

Hi Kent
The levy opposition process is well along the path at this time (for the
2003-2004 levy period) and only opposers already into the process are
allowed to directly address the copyright board (January 21, 2003).

On the other hand, the board will accept comments in written form and
says they'll take them into account.

You can write to your MP and to Cretien and Shiela Copps (Heritage
Minister) with your concerns.

You can go over the various objectors' sites and make (constructive)
comments on the information there as we have to prepare our case files
by November 22. This can include references to new information (studies,
articles, etc. that have been released/created since the summer) as well
as suggestions on specific methods of attack at the problem (some are
attacking the amounts in CPCC's calculations, some are attacking the
statistics they are based on - I'm attacking the concept of "copy" vs
"play" in regards to re-recordable media as well as offering a major
optional change in the method of calculation)

More than that, you and others can get involved with the next stage of
the problem - the proposed changes in the Copyright legislation with
regards to automated rights management. See
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/ for more on this subject.
Thanks for the question - hope to hear from you

richard  

 

 

Home ] Contents ] Search ]
Back ] Up ] Next ]

Copyright © 1993-2007 Richard C. Pitt - all rights reserved
Updated June 17, 2005